Open Access Peer-reviewed Editorial

Advances in education: from the Egyptian papyrus roll to signature pedagogies of the digital era

Article Sidebar

Download PDF
Submitted   Sep 25, 2019
Published   Sep 26, 2019
Issue    Vol 1 No 1 (2020)
DOI   10.25082/AERE.2019.01.001

Views

2607

Downloads

1821

Citations

PlumX Metrics

Main Article Content

Sergei Abramovich corresponding author
School of Education and Professional Studies, State University of New York, Potsdam, USA

Article Details

How to Cite
Abramovich, S. (2019). Advances in education: from the Egyptian papyrus roll to signature pedagogies of the digital era. Advances in Educational Research and Evaluation, 1(1), 1-5. https://doi.org/10.25082/AERE.2019.01.001
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

References

  1. Dewey J, 1938, Experience and Education, Kappa Delta Pi, New York.
  2. Thorndike EL, 1912, Education: A First Book, MacMillan, New York.
  3. Freire P, 2003, Pedagogy of the Oppressed, Continuum, New York.
  4. Chase AB, Manning HP and Archibald RC, 1927, The Rhind Mathematical Papyrus, British Museum 10057 and 10058, vol. 1, Mathematical Association of America, Oberlin, OH.
  5. Dai Q and Cheung KL, 2015, The wisdom of traditional mathematics teaching in China, in How Chinese Teach Mathematics, World Scientific, Singapore, 3-42. https://doi.org/10.1142/9789814415828_0001
  6. Gulley N, 1962, Plato’s Theory of Knowledge, Methuen, London.
  7. Gullickson AR, 2002, The Student Evaluation Standards: How to Improve Evaluations of Students, Corwin Press, Thousand Oaks, CA.
  8. Luchins AS, Mechanization in problem solving: The effect of Einstellung. Psychological Monographs, 1942, 54(6): 1- 95. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0093502
  9. Arnheim R, 1969, Visual Thinking, University of California Press, Berkeley and Los Angeles.
  10. Nejad MB, RashidiMand Oloumi MM. Avicenna’s educational views with emphasis on the education of hygiene and wellness. International Journal of Health Policy and Management, 2013, 1(3): 201-205. https://doi.org/10.15171/ijhpm.2013.37
  11. Department for Education, 2013, National Curriculum in England: Mathematics Programmes of Study, viewed on September 20, 2019. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/nationalcurriculum-in-england-mathematics-programmes-of-study
  12. Ministry of Education Singapore, 2012, Mathematics Syllabus: Secondary One to Four. Normal (Technical) Course. Curriculum Planning and Development Division, viewed on September 20, 2019. https://www.moe.gov.sg/education/syllabuses
  13. Common Core State Standards, 2010, Common Core Standards Initiative: Preparing America’s Students for College and Career, viewed on September 20, 2019. http://www.corestandards.org
  14. Horlacher R. Vocational and liberal education in Pestalozzi’s educational theory. Pedagogia Y Saberes, 2019, 50: 109-120. https://doi.org/10.17227/pys.num50-9504
  15. Gershenfeld N, 2005, Fab: The Coming Revolution on Your Desktop - From Personal Computers to Personal Fabrication, Basic Books, New York.
  16. James W, 1983, Talks to Teachers on Psychology, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
  17. Montessori M, 1917, Spontaneous Activity in Education, Frederick A. Stokes Publishers, New York.
  18. Makiguchi T, 1989, Education for Creative Living, Iowa State University Press, Ames, IA.
  19. Martin J, 1983, What should we do with a hidden curriculum when we find one?, in The Hidden Curriculum and Moral Education: Deception or Discovery?, McCutchan, Berkeley, CA, 122-140.
  20. Revans RV, 1982, The Origin and Growth of Action Learning, Chartwell-Bratt, Brickley, England.
  21. Naftalin I. Action learning in higher education. Educational Management and Administration, 1996, 24(2): 193-205. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263211X96242007
  22. Biggs J, 2003, Teaching for Quality Learning at University: What the Student Does, The Society for Research into Higher Education & Open University Press, Philadelphia, PA.
  23. Abramovich S, Grinshpan AZ and Milligan DL. Teaching mathematics through concept motivation and action learning. Educational Research International, 2019, ID 3745406: 13. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/3745406
  24. Greenwood D and Levin M, 2007, Introduction to Action Research, 2nd edn, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA.
  25. Pressey SL. A simple apparatus which gives tests and scores - and teaches. School and Society, 1926, 23(586): 373-376.
  26. Lumsdaine, AA, 1960, Teaching machines: an introductory overview, in Teaching Machines and Programmed Learning: A Source Book, Department of Audio-Visual Instruction, National Education Association of the United States, 5-22.
  27. Skinner BF. Teaching machines. Science, 1958, 128(3330): 969-977. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.128.3330.969
  28. Rabardel P, 1995, Les Hommes et les Technologies, une Approche Cognitive des Instruments Contemporains [Men and Technologies, a Cognitive Approach to Contemporary Instruments], Armand Colin, Paris, France.
  29. Vygotsky LS, 1930, The instrumental method in psychology (talk given in 1930 at the Krupskaya Academy of Communist Education), Lev Vygotsky Archive, viewed September 20, 2019. https://www.marxists.org/archive/vygotsky/works/1930/instrumental.htm
  30. Shulman LS. Signature pedagogies in the professions. Daedalus, 2005, 134(3): 52-59. https://doi.org/10.1162/0011526054622015
  31. Bruner J, 1985, Vygotsky: A historical and conceptual perspective, in Culture, Communication, and Cognition: Vygotskian Perspectives, New York, Cambridge University Press, 21-34.
  32. Wiliam D, 2011, Embedded Formative Assessment, Solution Tree Press, Bloomington, IN.