Open Access Peer-reviewed Research Article

Drivers of school performance over time: Evidence from public schools in the United States

Article Sidebar

Mathematics Achievement Score and Poverty Rate
Download PDF
Submitted   Mar 25, 2020
Published   Jun 1, 2020
Issue    Vol 1 No 2 (2020)
DOI   10.25082/AERE.2020.02.004

Views

3374

Downloads

1654

Citations

PlumX Metrics

Main Article Content

Allison Jennifer Ames corresponding author
Educational Statistics and Research Methods Program, College of Education and Health, University of Arkansas, USA
Simone Angioloni
Economics Research Branch, Agri-Food Biosciences Institution, Belfast, UK
Glenn C. W. Ames
Department of Agricultural & Applied Economics, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, USA

Abstract

Few studies have analyzed the effect of the drivers of school performance over time. This research investigates how school-level student characteristics, such as funding and student-teacher ratio, influence school academic performance in the short-term and in long-term, a key differentiating feature of this work from other studies. Our focus is on the U.S. state of Georgia, but the setting of Georgia is the same as settings throughout the U.S.: considerable variation between schools in achievement and resources. In this study, school performance is defined as the proportion of students that meet or exceed benchmarks on end of year exams. Study findings indicate that teacher experience, measured by average number of years teaching, and student-teacher ratio exhibit the largest effect in both the short and long-term. Poverty rate exhibited a strong negative effect on school performance, confirming previous studies. However, poverty rate had the most impact in the STEM subjects of math and science. School funding did not show any significant effect in school performance in the short-term, but a significant positive effect in the long-term, such that increased school funding per pupil improved school performance in future years. Our results indicate that investing resources to increase the number of teachers and hiring teachers with more experience can be economically more effective than simply increasing the per-pupil spending, at least in the short-term.

Keywords
school performance, school resources, achievement gap, effects over time, STEM

Article Details

How to Cite
Ames, A., Angioloni, S., & Ames, G. (2020). Drivers of school performance over time: Evidence from public schools in the United States. Advances in Educational Research and Evaluation, 1(2), 79-87. https://doi.org/10.25082/AERE.2020.02.004
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

References

  1. Greer L. Common Core standards, 2013. http://www.senate.ga.gov/sro/Documents/AtIssue/atissue_June13.pdf
  2. Owens S. Beyond basic education: Five ways for Georgia to fund schools fairly, 2018. https://cdn.gbpi.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/12/Beyond-Basic-Education-Five-Ways-for-Georgia-to-Fund-Schools-Fairly.pdf
  3. Suggs C. Tackle poverty’s effects to improve school performance, 2017. https://cdn.gbpi.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/Tackle-Poverty-in-Schools.pdf
  4. Baker B, Farrie D, Johnson M, et al. Is school funding fair? A national report card. Sixth edition. Newark: Education Law Center, Graduate School of Education, Rutgers University, 2017.
  5. Owens S. Georgia education budget primer for state fiscal year 2020, 2019a. https://gbpi.org/2019/georgia-education-budget-primer-for-state-fiscal-year-2020/
  6. Summers A and Wolfe B. Do schools make a difference? The American Economic Review, 1977, 67: 639-652. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1813396
  7. Hanushek E. The Economics of schooling: Production and efficiency in public schools. Journal of Economic Literature, 1986, 24: 1141-1177. www.jstor.org/stable/2725865
  8. Zimmer R and Toms E. Peer effects in private and public schools across countries. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 2000, 19: 75-92. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1520-6688(200024)19:1h75::AID-PAM5i3.0.CO;2-W
  9. Bowles T and Bosworth R. Scale economies in public education: Evidence from school level data. Journal of Education Finance, 2002, 28: 285-299. www.jstor.org/stable/40704168
  10. De Bartolome C. Equilibrium and inefficiency in a community model with peer group effects. Journal of Political Economy, 1990, 98: 110-133. www.jstor.org/stable/2937644
  11. Owens S. Overview: 2020 fiscal year budget for K-12 Education, 2019b. https://cdn.gbpi.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/2020K12budgetoverview-FINAL.pdf
  12. Reardon S. The Widening Academic Achievement Gap Between the Rich and the Poor: New Evidence and Possible Explanations, New York: Russell Sage Foundation Press. 2011.
  13. Bjorklund-Young A. Does Money Matter? Hanushek, Jackson, and the Questions We Ask. Baltimore: Institute for Education Policy, School of Education, Johns Hopkins University, 2017.
  14. Jackson C, Johnson R and Persico C. The effects of school spending on educational and economic outcomes: Evidence from school finance reforms. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 2016, 131: 157-218. https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjv036
  15. Blatchford P, Bassett P and Brown P. Examining the effect of class size on classroom engagement and teacher pupil interaction: Differences in relation to pupil prior attainment and primary vs. secondary schools. Learning and Instruction, 2011, 21: 715-730. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2011.04.001
  16. Van Hek M, Kraaykamp G and Perzer B. Do schools affect girls and boys reading performance differently? A multilevel study on the gendered effects of school resources and school practices. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 2018, 29(1): 1-28. https://doi.org10.1080/09243453.2017.1382540
  17. Card D and Krueger A. School quality and the return to education, in Gary Burtless (ed.) Does Money Matter? Effect of School Resources on Student Achievement and Adult Success. Massachusetts: Brookings Institute Press, 1996.
  18. Hirn R, Hollow A and Scott T. Exploring instructional differences and school performance in high-poverty elementary schools. Preventing School Failure: Alternative Education for Children and Youth, 2017, 62(1): 37-48. https://doi.org/10.1080/1045988X.2017.1329197
  19. Keele L and Kelly N. Dynamic models for dynamic theories: the ins and outs of lagged dependent variables. Political Analysis, 2006, 14: 186-205. www.jstor.org/stable/25791844
  20. Hamilton J. Time Series Analysis, Princeton: Princeton University Press. 1994.
  21. Angrist J and Pischke J. Mostly Harmless Econometrics, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2010.
  22. Guryan J. Desegregation and black dropout rates. The American Economic Review, 2004, 94: 919-943. http://doi.org/10.1257/0002828042002679
  23. Greene WH. Econometric Analysis, Harlow: Pearson Education Limited, 2010.
  24. Gravelle H, Jacobs R, Jones A, et al. Comparing the Efficiency of National Health Systems: Econometric Analysis Should Be Handled With Care. York: University of York Press, 2002.
  25. Deaton A. The Analysis of Household Surveys: A Microeconometric Approach to Development Policy, Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press, 1997.
  26. Georgia Department of Education. School system financial report, 2015. https://app3.doe.k12.ga.us/ows-bin/owa/fin_pack_revenue.entry_form?p_fiscal_year=2012
  27. Georgia Department of Education. CRCT statewide score, 2016a. http://www.gadoe.org/curriculum-instruction-and-assessment/assessment/pages/crct-statewide-scores.aspx
  28. Georgia Department of Education. School nutrition program, schools participating in cep (SY 2015-16) as of September 1 2015, 2016b. http://snp.wpgadoe.org/units/rtau/community-eligibility-provision/cep-percentages-2016-2018/
  29. Governor’s Office of Student Achievement.Downloadable data, 2016. https://gosa.georgia.gov/downloadable-data
  30. National Center of Education Statistics. Public elementary/ secondary universe survey data, 2016. https://nces.ed.gov/ccd/pubschuniv.asp
  31. Snyder T and Musu-Gillette L. Free or reduced-price lunch: A proxy for poverty? National Center for Educational Statistics blog post, 2015. https://nces.ed.gov/blogs/nces/post/free-or-reduced-pricelunch-a-proxy-for-poverty
  32. StataCorp. Stata Statistical Software: Release 13. College Station, TX: StataCorp LP,2013.
  33. Roza M. Education Economics: Where Do School Funds Go? Washington, D. C.: Urban Institute Press, 2010.
  34. Nye B, Hedges L and Konstantopoulos S. The effects of small classes on academic achievement: The results of the Tennessee class size experiment. American Educational Research Journal, 2000, 37(10): 123-151. www.jstor.org/stable/1163474
  35. Lareau A and Goyette KA. Choosing Homes, Choosing Schools. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation, 2014.
  36. Bureau of Labor Statistics. BLS data viewer [data file], 2016. https://beta.bls.gov/dataViewer/view/timeseries/CUSR0000SA0;jsessionid=12A79D60522575A5105513FBF17C9D5B
  37. Partelow L, Spong A, Brown C, et al. America needs more teachers of color and a more selective teaching profession, 2017. https://www.americanprogress.org/issues/education-k-12/reports/2017/09/14/437667/america-needs-teachers-colorselective-teaching-profession/