Open Access Peer-reviewed Research Article

Impact of surgical repair on the patients' quality of life with cleft lip and palate in the DRC: A longitudinal study using the CLEFT-Q scale

Main Article Content

Médard Kakule Kabuyaya
Olivier Mukuku corresponding author
Ahuka Onalongombe
Eshete Mekonen
Todd M. Van Ye
Paul Millican
Stanis O. Wembonyama
Severin Uwonda Akinja

Abstract

Introduction: Cleft lip and/or palate (CLP) are congenital anomalies that can have profound impacts on individuals’ lives, physically, emotionally and socially. In this context, patients’ quality of life (QoL) is of paramount importance to evaluate the effectiveness of surgical interventions and improve patient-centered care. The objective of this study was to evaluate the QoL of patients with CLP in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) before and after surgical repair, using the CLEFT-Q scale as a standardized measurement tool.
Methods: This longitudinal study was conducted between January and April 2024, involving 43 patients aged 8 to 29 years with CLP. The French version of the CLEFT-Q scale was utilized to evaluate various aspects of QoL both pre- and post-surgical intervention.
Results: the study revealed a significant enhancement in all facets of QoL assessed by the CLEFT-Q following surgical repair. Mean scores exhibited a statistically notable increase across all scales post-intervention. Furthermore, noticeable variations were noted among facial cleft types, indicating varying effects on QoL based on the particular cleft type.
Conclusion: This study underscores the significance of surgical repair in enhancing the QoL of individuals with CLP in the DRC. It also emphasizes the necessity of a personalized approach considering the distinct type of facial cleft to maximize treatment outcomes.

Keywords
cleft lip and palate, quality of life, reconstructive surgery, CLEFT-Q, DRC

Article Details

How to Cite
Kabuyaya, M. K., Mukuku, O., Onalongombe, A., Mekonen, E., Van Ye, T. M., Millican, P., Wembonyama, S. O., & Akinja, S. U. (2024). Impact of surgical repair on the patients’ quality of life with cleft lip and palate in the DRC: A longitudinal study using the CLEFT-Q scale. Advances in Health and Behavior, 6, 275-280. https://doi.org/10.25082/AHB.2023.01.004

References

  1. Salari N, Darvishi N, Heydari M, et al. Global prevalence of cleft palate, cleft lip and cleft palate and lip: A comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Stomatology, Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. 2022, 123(2): 110-120. urlhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jormas.2021.05.008
  2. Kortelainen T, Tolvanen M, Luoto A, et al. Comparison of Oral Health–Related Quality of Life among Schoolchildren with and without Cleft Lip and/or Palate. The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal. 2016, 53(5): 172-176. urlhttps://doi.org/10.1597/14-180
  3. Kabuyaya MK, Mukuku O, Kasereka JML, et al. Exploring quality of life disparities among 177 families with children affected by cleft lip and/or palate: A comprehensive analysis using the Impact on Family Scale. Theory and Clinical Practice in Pediatrics. 2024, 5: 114-120. urlhttps://doi.org/10.25082/tcpp.2024.01.001
  4. Braun SE, O’Connor MK, Garg RK. Adult Cleft Patients: An Exploration of Functional Needs and Treatment Barriers. Journal of Craniofacial Surgery. 2022, 34(1): 332-336. urlhttps://doi.org/10.1097/scs.0000000000008931
  5. Longombe AO, JM TK. The epidemiological approach of clefts lip and palate in the eastern of Democratic Republic of Congo. Annales de Chirurgie Plastique et Esthetique. 2012, 57(3): 245-249. urlhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.anplas.2012.02.012
  6. Sangwa CM, Mukuku O, Tshisuz C, et al. Fentes labiopalatines dans la province du Katanga en République Démocratique du Congo: Aspects épidémiologiques, anatomocliniques et thérapeutiques. Pan African Medical Journal. 2014, 17. urlhttps://doi.org/10.11604/pamj.2014.17.319.4268
  7. Wong Riff KWY, Tsangaris E, Forrest CR, et al. CLEFT-Q: Detecting Differences in Outcomes among 2434 Patients with Varying Cleft Types. Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery. 2019, 144(1): 78e-88e. urlhttps://doi.org/10.1097/prs.0000000000005723
  8. Klassen AF, Riff KWW, Longmire NM, et al. Psychometric findings and normative values for the CLEFT-Q based on 2434 children and young adult patients with cleft lip and/or palate from 12 countries. Canadian Medical Association Journal. 2018, 190(15): E455-E462. urlhttps://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.170289
  9. Chaisrisawadisuk S, Jaruniphakul K, Tongchenchitt S, et al. Thai CLEFT-Q: Phase 1—A Pilot Study of Translation and Cultural Adaptation in Thailand. The Cleft Palate Craniofacial Journal. 2022, 61(3): 357-364. urlhttps://doi.org/10.1177/10556656221132031
  10. Michael AI, Olusanya AA. The cleft Q as an outcome measure after palatoplasty. African Journal of Paediatric Surgery. 2022, 19(4): 268-270. urlhttps://doi.org/10.4103/ajps.ajps_115_21