Open Access Peer-reviewed Research Article

Decoupling of greenhouse gas emissions from economic growth in Cameroon

Article Sidebar

Trends in Cameroon’s economic growth and Energy intensity per unit of GDP from 1971 to 2014
Download PDF Download HTML
Submitted   Jan 15, 2019
Published   Feb 10, 2019
Issue    Vol 1 No 1 (2019)
DOI   10.25082/REE.2019.01.003

Views

3671

Downloads

2345

Citations

PlumX Metrics

Main Article Content

Jean Engo corresponding author
Center for Energy and Environmental Policy, School of Management and Economics, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081, China.

Abstract

Knowledge of decoupling indicators and its determinants is useful for formulating targeted policy recommendations. To this end, the Log-Mean Divisia Index and Tapio models were applied in this paper to study the decoupling relationship among economic growth and GHG emissions in Cameroon over the period 1971-2014. The analyzes were conducted according to the three major periods that marked Cameroon after independence and the decoupling indicators were broken down into seven factors while considering the three main GHGs emitted in this country (i.e. CO2, CH4, and N2O). The results showed that weak decoupling, strong decoupling, and strong negative decoupling occurred in Cameroon during the periods 1971-1984 and 1994-2014 which represent the periods before and after the economic crisis, respectively. In addition to these three decoupling statuses, recessive decoupling only appeared during the economic crisis period (1984-1994). From 1971 to 1984 and between 1994 and 2014, carbon intensity, economic activity, population, and emission factor not only contributed to the increase of Cameroon’s GHG (particularly CO2) emissions but also prevented decoupling. Unlike the period 1984-1994, energy intensity contributed to reducing environmental pollution while promoting decoupling during the periods 1971-1984 and 1994-2014. Although all played an important role in decoupling, we found that after the introduction of natural gas into the country’s energy mix from 2007, the effect of renewable energies on the mitigation of Cameroon’s CO2 emissions remained higher than the substitution of fossil fuels. However, to develop a cleaner economy, Cameroon should maintain modest economic growth and continuously transform economic development pathways, while encouraging the use of renewable energy to further reduce energy intensity per unit of GDP per capita.

Keywords
Cameroon, economic growth, decoupling, CO₂ emission, energy intensity, greenhouse gas, environmental pollution

Article Details

How to Cite
Engo, J. (2019). Decoupling of greenhouse gas emissions from economic growth in Cameroon. Resources and Environmental Economics, 1(1), 16-28. https://doi.org/10.25082/REE.2019.01.003
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

References

  1. Ypersele JV. Climate Change Projections for 2050 / 2100 and their Potential Impacts in the Middle East Why the IPCC? Established by WMO and UNEP in 1988. IPCC, January, 2015.
  2. IPCC. Climate Change 2014: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, 2014.
  3. Marchal V, et al. OECD environmental outlook to 2050: Climate change chapter. Oecd, November, 2011: 90.
  4. UNFCCC. Paris Agreement. Conference of the Parties on its twenty-first session, 21932, December, 2015: 32.
  5. IEA. CO2 emissions from fuel combustion. Oecd/Iea, 2017: 1-155.
  6. Van Dingenen R, et al. Global trends of methane emissions and their impacts on ozone concentrations, JRC SCIENCE FOR POLICY REPORT, 2018.
  7. Davidson EA, Kanter D. Inventories and scenarios of nitrous oxide emissions. Environmental Research Letters, 2014, 9(10): 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/9/10/105012
  8. MINEPAT. CAmeroun vision 2035. Ministere de l’économie, de la planification et de l’amenagement du territoire, June 2009: 76.
  9. CIA. The World Factbook - Central Intelligence Agency. Central Intelligence Agency (US), 2018.
  10. WDI. World Development Indicators, DataBank. The World Bank, 2018.
  11. OECD-AfDB. African Economic Outlook. OECD-AfDB, 2001: 71-82.
  12. Cogneau D, Herrera J. Ia devaluation du fcfa au cameroun: Bilan et perspectives. 1995: 23.
  13. IEA-CMR. Cameroon International Energy Agency Balances, 2018.
  14. INDC-CMR. Republique Du Cameroun Contribution Prevue Determinee Au Plan National ( Cpdn ) Intended Nationally Determined Contribution ( Indc ). Population, M W Us, Mds Cpdn, La Industrialis, Nouveau Pays, 2015: 1-17.
  15. Zhang Z. Decoupling China’s Carbon Emissions Increase from Economic Growth: An Economic Analysis and Policy Implications. World Development, 200. 28(4): 739–752.
  16. OECD. Indicators to measure decoupling of environmental pressure from economic growth. Sustainable development, 2010.
  17. Wu Y, Zhu Q, Zhu B. Decoupling analysis of world economic growth and CO2 emissions: A study comparing developed and developing countries. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2018, 190: 94-103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.04.139
  18. Wang Q, Zhao M, Li R,et al. Decomposition and decoupling analysis of carbon emissions from economic growth: A comparative study of China and the United States. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2018, 197: 178-184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.05.285
  19. Dai S, Zhang M, Huang W. Decomposing the decoupling of CO2 emission from economic growth in BRICS countries. Natural Hazards, 2016, 84(2): 1055-1073. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-016-2472-0
  20. Engo J. Decomposing the decoupling of CO2 emissions from economic growth in Cameroon. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-3511-z
  21. Mikayilov JI, Hasanov FJ, Galeotti M. Decoupling of CO2 emissions and GDP: A time-varying cointegration approach. Ecological Indicators, 2018, 95:615-628. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.07.051
  22. Zhang X, Zhao y, Wang Cet al. Decoupling effect and sectoral attribution analysis of industrial energy-related carbon emissions in Xinjiang, China. Ecological Indicators, 2019, 97: 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.09.056
  23. Li W, Sun S, Li H. Decomposing the decoupling relationship between energy-related CO 2 emissions. Natural Hazards, , 2015, 79(2): 977-997. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-015-1887-3
  24. Zhang YJ, Da YB. The decomposition of energy-related carbon emission and its decoupling with economic growth in China. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, , 2015, 4: 1255-1266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2014.09.021
  25. Tamba JG. Energy consumption, economic growth, and CO2 emissions: Evidence from Cameroon. Energy Sources, Part B: Economics, Planning and Policy, 2017, 12(9): 779–785. https://doi.org/10.1080/15567249.2016.1278486
  26. Noubissi Domguia E, Njangang H. Croissance économique et dégradation de l’environnement au Cameroun: Croissance économique et dégradation de l’environnement. African Development Review, 2017, 29: 615-629. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8268.12300
  27. Hilaire N, Hervé KF. TITRE : Effets de la croissance économique sur les émissions de CO2 dans les Pays du Bassin du Congo, 2012: 1-17.
  28. Tapio P. Towards a theory of decoupling: degrees of decoupling in the EU and the case of road traffic in Finland between 1970 and 2001. Transport Policy, 2005, 12(2): 137-151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2005.01.001
  29. Vehmas J, Malaska P, Luukkanen J, et al. Europe in the global battle of sustainability: Rebound strikes back? Advanced sustainability analysis, publications of the Turku School of Economics and Business Administration, Series discussion and working papers, Turku, 2003: 7.
  30. CNI. Climate change governance in Cameroon Official doc. UNFCCC-CAMEROON, 1994: 160.
  31. Ang BW. LMDI decomposition approach: A guide for implementation. Energy Policy, 2015, (Sup: C)86: 233-238.
  32. Kaya Y. Impact of carbon dioxide emission on GNP growth: interpretation of proposed scenarios. Paris: Presentation to the Energy and Industry Subgroup, Response Strategies Working Group, IPCC. X’Pert Stress PW3208, Software for Residual stress analysis, PANalytical, The Netherlands, 1990.
  33. Peters GP, Andrew RM, Canadell JG, et al. Key indicators to track current progress and future ambition of the Paris Agreement. Nature Climate Change, 2017, 7(2): 118-122. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate3202
  34. ACAT. Emeutes de Fevrier 2008: Suivi des recommandations, 2008: 18.