Open Access Peer-reviewed Research Article

Nordic childcare policies and their implications for South Korea: A documentary analysis

Article Sidebar

Flowchart showing framework of analysis
Download PDF
Submitted   Nov 1, 2020
Published   Jan 15, 2021
Issue    Vol 3 No 1 (2021)
DOI   10.25082/SWSW.2021.01.002

Views

2731

Downloads

1515

Citations

PlumX Metrics

Main Article Content

Eon Ha Park corresponding author
Department of Social Welfare and Early Child Education, Daedong College, Geum-Jeong-Gu, Dong-Bu-Gok-Ro 27, Beon-Gil 88, Busan 46270, South Korea

Abstract

Korea has experienced several decades of low birth rates, contributing to an aging population. The government has unsuccessfully attempted several policies to develop and maintain childbirth and childcare that would mitigate the reduction of the productive workforce. Korean policy makers consider the Nordic countries the benchmark for the development and implementation of social welfare programs, but they have been unable to achieve similar levels of success in reversing low fertility. Using documentary research, this study explores the nature and impact of childcare policies in Sweden, Norway, Denmark, Finland, and Korea to gain insights that could help optimize childcare policies in Korea. Based on this analysis, this study recommends that Korea adopt childcare policies that focus on defamiliarization, decommodification, gender integration, and a child-centered approach.

Keywords
childcare costs, social welfare, gender equality, child-centered approach, labor

Article Details

How to Cite
Park, E. H. (2021). Nordic childcare policies and their implications for South Korea: A documentary analysis. Social Work and Social Welfare, 3(1), 91-101. https://doi.org/10.25082/SWSW.2021.01.002
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

References

  1. Atoh M. Very low fertility in Japan and value change hypothesis. Review of Population and Social Policy, 2001, 10(1): 1-21.
  2. Lee S. Low fertility and policy responses in Korea. The Japanese Journal of Population, 2009, 7(1): 57-70.
  3. Sobotka T. Post-transitional fertility: Childbearing postponement and the shift to low and unstable fertility levels. Journal of Biosocial Science, 2017, 49(S1): 20-45. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021932017000323
  4. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, Strengthening social cohesion in Korea, OECD Publishing, Paris, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264188945-en
  5. McDonald P. Very low fertility: Consequences, causes and policy approaches. The Japanese Journal of Population, 2008, 6(1): 19-23.
  6. Statistics Korea, 2019. http://kostat.go.kr/portal/eng/index.action
  7. Chung, SH. Policy responses to low fertility and its problems. Korean Journal of Population Studies, 2015, 38(2): 113-134.
  8. Lee S and Choi H. Lowest-low fertility and policy responses in South Korea, in Low and Lower Fertility, Springer, Cham, 2015: 107-123. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-21482-5_6
  9. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, Family database, OECD Publishing, Paris, 2014. http://www.oecd.org/els/family/database.htm
  10. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, Starting strong IV: Monitoring quality in early childhood education and care, OECD Publishing, Paris, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264233515-en
  11. Kim WS. Korean growth-oriented welfare model based on government expenditures of Northern European countries. The Korean Association of Public Finance, 2014: 1-23.
  12. Norwegian Ministry of Education and Research, 2013.
  13. Partanen A. The Nordic Theory of Everything: in Search of a Better Life, Seoul, Wonderbox, 2017.
  14. Shin DJ. Early childhood education and care system in Nordic countries: Norway, Finland and Sweden. The Korean Society for Early Childhood Teacher Education, 2015, 19(5): 73-99.
  15. Yoon HS. The differences and similarity of family policies in Nordic countries: Childcare and parental leave. Korean Journal of Social Welfare, 2007, 59(2): 327-354. https://doi.org/10.20970/kasw.2007.59.2.013
  16. Lewis J. Work-family balance policies, Massachusetts: Edward Elgar, 2009.
  17. Gilbert N and Terrell P. Theory of social welfare policy: Analysis framework and selection. Seoul: Nanumbook, 2007.
  18. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, Starting strong II: Early childhood education and care data country note, OECD Publishing, Paris, 2006. http://www.oecd.org/education/school/startingstrongiiearlychildhoodeducationandcare.htm
  19. Wennemo I. Sharing the costs of children: Studies on the development of family support in the OECD countries. Stockholm: Swedish Institute for Social Research, 1994.
  20. Eydal GB and Rostgaard T. Caring family-policies and practices in Nordic countries: Challenges for future family policy in Nordic countries, Copenhagen: SFI, 2013.
  21. Na Y and Lamblin M. Slow life of Finland, Seoul: Miraebook, 2015.
  22. Kremer M. How welfare states care: Culture, gender and parenting in Europe, Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press, 2007. https://doi.org/10.5117/9789053569757
  23. Ministry of Social Affairs and Health. Child and family policy in Finland, Helsinki, 2013. http://julkaisut.valtioneuvosto.fi/bitstream/handle/10024/69916/URN_ISBN_978-952-00-3378-1.pdf
  24. Duvander AZ and Johansson M. For which fathers do reforms matter? A study of the impact of three Swedish parental leave reforms, Stockholms Universitet, 2014. https://www.leavenetwork.org/fileadmin/user_upload/k_leavenetwork/seminars/2015/DuvanderTrondheimSep2015.pdf
  25. Røstgaard T and Lausten M. The coming and going of the father’s quota in Denmark: Consequences for fathers’ parental leave take-up, in Fatherhood in the Nordic welfare states-Comparing care policies and practice, Bristol: Policy Press, 2014: 277-302. https://doi.org/10.1332/policypress/9781447310471.003.0013
  26. Rostgaard T. Setting time aside for the father: Father’s leave in Scandinavia. Community, Work and Family, 2002, 5(3): 343-364. https://doi.org/10.1080/1366880022000041810
  27. Lee YJ. Nursery policy in Finland, Korea Institute of Child Care and Education, 2016, 49: 34-45.
  28. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development. Parental leave: Where are the fathers? OECD policy brief. OECD Publishing, Paris, 2016. https://www.oecd.org/policy-briefs/parental-leave-where-are-the-fathers.pdf
  29. Nuffield Foundation. Early childhood education and care. London, 2017. https://www.nuffieldfoundation.org/sites/default/files/files/Early_years education_and_childcare_Nuffield_FINAL.pdf
  30. Ministry of Health and Welfare. Nurture policy in Korea. Sejong, 2017. https://www.mohw.go.kr/eng
  31. Ministry of Employment and Labor. Childcare leave and childcare allowances. Sejong, 2017. http://www.moel.go.kr/english/poli/poliNewsnews_view.jsp?idx=1532