Open Access Peer-reviewed Commentary

Social workers and community planners in the U.S.: Connecting in the academy and in the field

Main Article Content

Elizabeth Shay corresponding author
Maureen MacNamara

Abstract

The professions of social work and regional planning, as practiced in the U.S., have overlapping and intertwining professional interests and shared goals. And yet, there are few examples of U.S. academic programs formally linking students preparing for careers in social work and planning. These two service-oriented fields use different tools and strategies, but have common aspirations to promote healthy, lively, and just communities. In particular, professional planners and community practice social workers in the U.S. cross paths relatively infrequently and may fail to recognize their own shared interests in domains such as dignified affordable housing, healthy safe environments, transportation equity, and more. We argue for greater exposure to and integration of the work of students and practitioners in these two professions.

Keywords
community practice social work, community and regional planning, inter-professional education

Article Details

Supporting Agencies
The authors thanks Nick Gastelle for assistance with interviews.
How to Cite
Shay, E., & MacNamara, M. (2024). Social workers and community planners in the U.S.: Connecting in the academy and in the field. Social Work and Social Welfare, 6(1), 302-306. https://doi.org/10.25082/SWSW.2024.01.001

References

  1. Mucci N. Social Work and Social Welfare from a Multidisciplinary Perspective - A Challenge for Researchers. Social Work and Social Welfare. 2018, 1(1): 1-3. https://doi.org/10.25082/swsw.2018.01.002
  2. Wenger E and Wenger B. Introduction to Communities of Practice: A Brief Overview of the Concept and its Uses, 2003. https://www.wenger-trayner.com
  3. Nisbet G, Hendry GD, Rolls G, et al. Interprofessional learning for pre-qualification health care students: An outcomes-based evaluation. Journal of Interprofessional Care. 2008, 22(1): 57-68. https://doi.org/10.1080/13561820701722386
  4. Payler J, Meyer E, Humphris D. Theorizing interprofessional pedagogic evaluation: framework for evaluating the impact of interprofessional continuing professional development on practice change. Learning in Health and Social Care. 2007, 6(3): 156-169. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1473-6861.2007.00156.x
  5. Checkoway B. Core Concepts for Community Change. Journal of Community Practice. 1997, 4(1): 11-29. https://doi.org/10.1300/j125v04n01_02
  6. Cohen AK, Schuchter JW. Revitalizing Communities Together. Journal of Urban Health. 2012, 90(2): 187-196. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11524-012-9733-3
  7. Simmons L. Community organizing in social work and progressive urban planning – interdisciplinary challenges and opportunities. Journal of Community Practice. 2024, 32(3): 267-284. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705422.2024.2384594
  8. Tropman JE. Micro, Mezzo, and Macro: A Guide to the Levels of Social Work, MSWOnline, 2023. https://mastersinsocialworkonline.org
  9. Shay E, MacNamara M. Planning and social work: teaching pre-professional university students across colleges. Journal of Community Practice. 2023, 31(1): 11-23. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705422.2023.2188339
  10. Shay E, MacNamara M. Rural Community Development as a Teaching Environment for Cross-Professional Training in Macro Social Work and Community and Regional Planning. Contemporary Rural Social Work Journal. 2019, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.61611/2165-4611.1183
  11. Park J, Hawkins W, Hawkins M, et al. Attitudes Toward Interprofessional Collaboration Among Students in the Health Care Professions. Advances in Social Work. 2013, 14(2): 556-572. https://doi.org/10.18060/2953
  12. David VB. Legal education for social work students: Toward an interdisciplinary framework of teaching and practice. Social Work and Social Welfare. 2021, 3(1): 111-120. https://doi.org/10.25082/swsw.2021.01.004