Open Access Peer-reviewed Research Article

Ethnic/Racial disparities in Disciplinary Alternative Education Program placements for Texas Grade 6, 7 and 8 boys: A statewide, multiyear analysis

Article Sidebar

Frequencies and percentages
Download PDF
Submitted   Nov 19, 2019
Published   Jan 28, 2020
Issue    Vol 1 No 1 (2020)
DOI   10.25082/AERE.2020.01.006

Views

3178

Downloads

1775

Citations

PlumX Metrics

Main Article Content

Edward L Lopez
Sam Houston State University, Huntsville, USA
John R Slate corresponding author
Sam Houston State University, Huntsville, USA

Abstract

In this investigation, the extent to which Disciplinary Alternative Education Program placement assignments differed as a function of ethnicity/race (i.e., Black, Hispanic, White, Asian) for Grade 6, 7, and 8 boys was determined.  Archival data were obtained from the Texas Education Agency Public Education Information Management System on all middle school students for the 2011-2012, 2013-2014, 2014-2015, and 2015-2016 school years.  Inferential statistical procedures yielded statistically significant differences for all four school years with below small effect sizes.  For each year, in each grade level, a stair-step effect was present.  Grade 6 through Grade 8 Black boys received a Disciplinary Alternative Education Program placement statistically significantly more often than their peers at all three grade levels.  Similarly, Grade 6 through Grade 8 Hispanic boys received statistically significantly more instances of a Disciplinary Alternative Education Program placement than did White and Asian boys.  Recommendations for research and implications are discussed along with suggestions for policy and practice.

Keywords
disciplinary inequities, Disciplinary Alternative Education Program placements, ethnicity-race, Black, Hispanic, White, Asian, Grade 6, 7 and 8 boys

Article Details

How to Cite
Lopez, E., & Slate, J. (2020). Ethnic/Racial disparities in Disciplinary Alternative Education Program placements for Texas Grade 6, 7 and 8 boys: A statewide, multiyear analysis. Advances in Educational Research and Evaluation, 1(1), 33-42. https://doi.org/10.25082/AERE.2020.01.006
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

References

  1. U.S. Department of Education. 2014. Rethinking school discipline: Remarks of U.S. secretary of education Arne Duncan at the release of the joint DOJ-ED School Discipline Guidance Package.
  2. U.S. Department of Education. 2016. School climate and discipline: Know the data. http://www.ed.gov/policy/gen/guid/school-discipline/data/html
  3. Office for Civil Rights. 2014. Data collection: US public schools. http://ocrdata.ed.gov/
  4. American Civil Liberties Union. 2016. Locating the schoolto- prison pipeline? American Civil Liberties Union and the ACLU Foundation. http//www.aclu.org/fact-sheet/what-school-prison-pipeline
  5. Amurao C. 2016. Fact sheet: How bad is the school-toprison pipeline? Tavis Smiley Reports/PBS.
  6. Texas Education Agency. 2010a. Education Code 37. Alternative settings for behavior management. http://www.statues.legis.state.tx.us/Docs/ED/htm/ED.37.html
  7. Texas Education Agency. 2010b. Standards for the operation of school district disciplinary alternative education programs. http://ritter.tea.state.tx.us/rules/tac/chapter103/ch103cc.html
  8. Cortez A and Cortez JD. 2009. Disciplinary alternative education program in Texas. Intercultural Development Research Association-2009 update, San Antonio, TX: Intercultural Development Research Association.
  9. Levin M. 2006. Schooling a new class of criminals? Better disciplinary alternatives for Texas students. Texas Public Policy Foundation. http://old.texaspolicy.com
  10. Henkel BL, Slate JR and Martinez-Garcia C. Out-of-school suspension and differences in reading and mathematics achievement by gender and ethnicity/race. Journal of Ethical Educational Leadership, 2016, 3(2): 1-27. http://cojeel.org/?page_id=37
  11. Hilberth M and Slate JR. Middle school Black and White student assignment to disciplinary consequences: A clear lack of equity. Education & Urban Society, 2014, 46: 312- 328. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013124512446218
  12. Jones MC, Slate JR and Martinez-Garcia C. Discipline inequities between White and Hispanic middle school students: An analysis of the research literature. Journal of Ethical Educational Leadership, 2014, 1(6): 2-35. http://cojeel.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/JEELvo1no6.pdf
  13. Harry B and Anderson JR. The disproportionate placement of African American males in special education programs: A critique of the process. Journal of Negro Education, 1995, 63: 602-619. https://doi.org/10.2307/2967298
  14. Skiba RJ, Horner RH, Chung CG, et al. Race is not neutral: A national investigation of African American and Latino disproportionality in school discipline. School Psychology Review, 2011, 40(1): 85-107.
  15. Gregory A, Skiba RJ and Noguera PA. The achievement gap and the discipline gap: 2 sides of the same coin? Educational Researcher, 2010, 39(1): 59-68. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X09357621
  16. Johnson RB and Christensen L. 2012. Educational research. Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed approaches (4th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
  17. Maughan S. Policy and implementation of the juvenile justice alternative programs throughout the state of Texas. Journal of Correctional Education, 1999, 50: 124-129.
  18. Field A. Discovering statistics using SPSS (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Gottfredson, D. (1989). Reducing disorderly behavior in middle schools. Office of Educational Center of Research and Improvement, U. S. Department of Education, 2009, 37: 1-26.
  19. Cohen J. 1988. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  20. Carpenter D, Ramirez A and Severn L. Gap or gapsChallenging the singular definition of the achievement gap. Education and Urban Society, 2006, 39(1): 113-127. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013124506291792
  21. Barnes MJ and Slate JR. Grade 4 and 4 inequities in disciplinary consequences by ethnicity/race and gender. Journal of Global Research in Education and Social Science, 2016, 5(4): 216-221. http://ikprress.org/index.php/JOGRESS/article/view/1916
  22. Khan MQ and Slate JR. Disciplinary consequence differences in Grade 6 students as a function of race/ethnicity and economic status. Journal of School Administration Research and Development, 2016, 1: 39-46.
  23. Lopez E and Slate JR. Differences in disciplinary alternative educational placement as a function of economic status for White students. Journal of Global Research in Education and Social Sciences, 2016, 6(2): 75-79.
  24. Texas Education Agency. (2014). Public Education Information Management System. http://www.tea.state.tx.us/index4.aspx?id=3012