Open Access Peer-reviewed Research Article

Post-ACA health insurance decisions: A survey on risk attitudes and consumer confidence

Article Sidebar

Conference board consumer confidence index
Download PDF
Submitted   Jul 25, 2024
Published   Sep 18, 2024
Issue    Vol 5 No 1 (2024)
DOI   10.25082/FMB.2024.01.003

Views

192

Downloads

36

Citations

PlumX Metrics

Main Article Content

Florent Nkouaga corresponding author
National Association of Insurance Commissioners (NAIC), Kansas City, MO, USA

Abstract

Objective: This study investigates the reluctance of individuals in the United States to get health insurance, specifically examining the psychological and sociodemographic aspects that contribute to this reluctance within the Affordable Care Act (ACA) framework. The research objective is to ascertain the behavioral factors contributing to insurance hesitation and offer valuable perspectives for decreasing the number of individuals without health insurance and enhancing health security.
Methodology: The study uses data from the 2022 Survey of Consumer Finances to analyze the impact of specific variables such as risk tolerance, consumer confidence, income, education, age, and marital status on health insurance coverage choices. We also address issues related to cost, perceived health requirements, previous experiences, and misunderstandings about eligibility.
Conclusion: The study demonstrates that higher customer confidence, frequently associated with financial stability, decreases reluctance to obtain insurance. By contrast, individuals with more risk tolerance exhibit more hesitancy, opting to depend on internal resilience. Furthermore, substantial demographic disparities indicate the presence of several obstacles in acquiring comprehensive coverage.
Implications and Recommendations: The results underscore the necessity of tailored policy interventions that address the unique requirements of different demographic groups. It is crucial to consider both psychological and sociodemographic aspects to promote insurance adoption and ensure universal health security. The present study makes a valuable contribution to the current body of literature by offering a comprehensive examination of health insurance hesitation following the Affordable Care Act (ACA) implementation.

Keywords
health insurance, ACA, insurance hesitancy, racial disparities, consumer confidence, risk tolerance

Article Details

How to Cite
Nkouaga, F. (2024). Post-ACA health insurance decisions: A survey on risk attitudes and consumer confidence. Frontiers in Management and Business, 5(1), 408-424. https://doi.org/10.25082/FMB.2024.01.003
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

References

  1. Artiga S, Hill L, Damico A. Health coverage by race and ethnicity, 2010-2021. Technology report of Kaiser Family Foundation, 2022.
  2. Hossain T, Hoang M, Nguyen S. A Qualitative Study of Consumers’ Perceptions of the Affordable Care Act. Theoretical Economics Letters. 2019, 09(05): 1569-1593. https://doi.org/10.4236/tel.2019.95101
  3. Taber JM, Leyva B, Persoskie A. Why do People Avoid Medical Care? A Qualitative Study Using National Data. Journal of General Internal Medicine. 2014, 30(3): 290-297. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-014-3089-1
  4. Perreira KM, Allen CD, Oberlander J. Access to Health Insurance and Health Care for Hispanic Children in the United States. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science. 2021, 696(1): 223-244. https://doi.org/10.1177/00027162211050007
  5. Crowley R, Daniel H, Cooney TG, et al. Envisioning a Better U.S. Health Care System for All: Coverage and Cost of Care. Annals of Internal Medicine. 2020, 172(2$_$Supplement): S7. https://doi.org/10.7326/m19-2415
  6. Mathur T, Paul UK, Prasad HN, et al. Understanding perception and factors influencing private voluntary health insurance policy subscription in the Lucknow region. International Journal of Health Policy and Management. 2014, 4(2): 75-83. https://doi.org/10.15171/ijhpm.2015.08
  7. Garretsen H, Stoker JI. Economic geography meets psychology: Motivation, results, design and agenda. Current Research in Ecological and Social Psychology. 2023, 4: 100121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cresp.2023.100121
  8. Montero A, Kearney A, Hamel L, et al. “Americans’ challenges with health care costs”. In: Kaiser Family Foundation, July 14, 2022.
  9. Haynes LA. The state of US health insurance in 2022: findings from the Com- monwealth Fund biennial health insurance survey. Commonwealth Fund, 2022.
  10. Blumenthal D, Abrams M, Nuzum R. The Affordable Care Act at 5 Years. Hamel MB, ed. New England Journal of Medicine. 2015, 372(25): 2451-2458. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmhpr1503614
  11. Cohen AB, Colby DC, Wailoo KA, et al. Medicare and Medicaid at 50: America’s entitlement programs in the age of affordable care. Oxford Uni- versity Press, 2015.
  12. Vicini J, Stempel J. “US top court upholds healthcare law in Obama triumph”. In: Reuters, sec. Wrap Up. June 28, 2012.
  13. Oberlander J. Long time coming: why health reform finally passed. Health Affairs. 2010, 29(6): 1112-1116.
  14. Kominski GF, Nonzee NJ, Sorensen A. The Affordable Care Act’s Impacts on Access to Insurance and Health Care for Low-Income Populations. Annual Review of Public Health. 2017, 38(1): 489-505. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-publhealth-031816-044555
  15. Rosenbaum S. The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act: Implications for Public Health Policy and Practice. Public Health Reports. 2011, 126(1): 130-135. https://doi.org/10.1177/003335491112600118
  16. Binckes J, Wing N. The Top 18 Immediate Effects Of The Health Care Bill. The Huffington Post. 2010: 03-22.
  17. Angeles J. How health reform’s Medicaid expansion will impact state budgets. Center on Budget and Policy Priorities. 2012 Jul 12.
  18. Ercia A. The impact of the Affordable Care Act on patient coverage and access to care: perspectives from FQHC administrators in Arizona, California and Texas. BMC Health Services Research. 2021, 21(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-06961-9
  19. Uberoi N, Finegold K, Gee E. Health insurance coverage and the Affordable Care Act, 2010-2016. Washington (DC): Department of Health and Human Services, Office of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation; 2016 Mar 3.
  20. Gruber J. The impacts of the Affordable Care Act: how reasonable are the projections?. National Tax Journal. 2011, 64(3): 893-908. https://doi.org/10.17310/ntj.2011.3.06
  21. Williamson A, Antonisse L, Tolbert J, et al. ACA Coverage Expansions and Low-Income Workers. Melon Park: The Henry Kaiser Family Foundation. 2016 Jun 10.
  22. Dong X, Gindling TH, Miller NA. Effects of the Medicaid expansion under the Affordable Care Act on health insurance coverage, health care access, and use for people with disabilities. Disability and Health Journal. 2022, 15(1): 101180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dhjo.2021.101180
  23. Ellis P. Budgetary and economic effects of repealing the Affordable Care Act. Congressional Budget Office, 2015.
  24. Sheils JF, Haught RA, editors. Analysis of the costs and impact of universal health care models for the state of Maryland: the single-payer and multi-payer models. Fairfax, Va.: Lewin Group; 2000 May 2.
  25. Saltman RB, Figueras J. Analyzing The Evidence On European Health Care Reforms. Health Affairs. 1998, 17(2): 85-108. https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.17.2.85
  26. Pritchard C, Wallace MS. Comparing the USA, UK and 17 Western countries’ efficiency and effectiveness in reducing mortality. JRSM Short Reports. 2011, 2(7): 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1258/shorts.2011.011076
  27. Artiga S. Health coverage by race and ethnicity: The potential impact of the Affordable Care Act. Washington, DC: Kaiser Family Foundation. 2013 Mar.
  28. 5 Baumgartner JC, Collins SR, Radley DC. Inequities in Health Insurance Coverage and Access for Black and Hispanic Adults. Commonwealth Fund. 2023.
  29. Cunningham PJ, Ginsburg PB. What Accounts for Differences in Uninsurance Rates across Communities? INQUIRY: The Journal of Health Care Organization, Provision, and Financing. 2001, 38(1): 6-21. https://doi.org/10.5034/inquiryjrnl_38.1.6
  30. Kamimura A, Tabler J, Chernenko A, et al. Why Uninsured Free Clinic Patients Don’t Apply for Affordable Care Act Health Insurance in a Non-expanding Medicaid State. Journal of Community Health. 2015, 41(1): 119-126. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10900-015-0076-3
  31. Sohn H. Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Health Insurance Coverage: Dynamics of Gaining and Losing Coverage Over the Life-Course. Population Research and Policy Review. 2016, 36(2): 181-201. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11113-016-9416-y
  32. Buchmueller TC, Levy HG. The ACA’s Impact On Racial And Ethnic Disparities In Health Insurance Coverage And Access To Care. Health Affairs. 2020, 39(3): 395-402. https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2019.01394
  33. Lee DC, Liang H, Shi L. The convergence of racial and income disparities in health insurance coverage in the United States. International Journal for Equity in Health. 2021, 20(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-021-01436-z
  34. Jeudin P, Liveright E, del Carmen MG, et al. Race, ethnicity and income as factors for HPV vaccine acceptance and use. Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics. 2013, 9(7): 1413-1420. https://doi.org/10.4161/hv.24422
  35. McElfish PA, Selig JP, Scott AJ, et al. Associations Between General Vaccine Hesitancy and Healthcare Access Among Arkansans. Journal of General Internal Medicine. 2022, 38(4): 841-847. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-022-07859-w
  36. Oyekale AS. Effect of Health Insurance Uptake on Hesitancy toward COVID-19 Vaccines in Nigeria: A Recursive Bivariate Probit and Decomposition Estimation. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2023, 20(3): 2566. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20032566
  37. MacDonald NE. Vaccine hesitancy: Definition, scope and determinants. Vaccine. 2015, 33(34): 4161-4164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2015.04.036
  38. Courtemanche C, Marton J, Ukert B, et al. Early Impacts of the Affordable Care Act on Health Insurance Coverage in Medicaid Expansion and Non‐Expansion States. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management. 2016, 36(1): 178-210. https://doi.org/10.1002/pam.21961
  39. Simon K, Soni A, Cawley J. The Impact of Health Insurance on Preventive Care and Health Behaviors: Evidence from the First Two Years of the ACA Medicaid Expansions. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management. 2017, 36(2): 390-417. https://doi.org/10.1002/pam.21972
  40. Mazurenko O, Balio CP, Agarwal R, et al. The Effects Of Medicaid Expansion Under The ACA: A Systematic Review. Health Affairs. 2018, 37(6): 944-950. https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2017.1491
  41. Abel J, Bram J, Rich RW. Consumer Confidence: A Useful Indicator of... the Labor Market?. Federal Reserve Bank of New York; 2013 Sep 4.
  42. Acemoglu D, Scott A. Consumer Confidence and Rational Expectations: Are Agents’ Beliefs Consistent with the Theory? The Economic Journal. 1994, 104(422): 1. https://doi.org/10.2307/2234671
  43. Mazurek J, Mielcová E. Is consumer confidence index a suitable predictor of future economic growth? An evidence from the USA. E+M Ekonomie a management. 2017, 20(2): 30-45. https://doi.org/10.15240/tul/001/2017-2-003
  44. Dominitz J, Manski CF. How Should We Measure Consumer Confidence? Journal of Economic Perspectives. 2004, 18(2): 51-66. https://doi.org/10.1257/0895330041371303
  45. Piger JM. Consumer confidence surveys: do they boost forecasters' confidence?. The Regional Economist. 2003: 10-11.
  46. von Neumann J, Morgenstern O. Theory of Games and Economic Behavior (60th Anniversary Commemorative Edition). Princeton University Press, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400829460
  47. Pratt JW. Risk Aversion in the Small and in the Large. Uncertainty in Economics. 1978: 59-79. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-214850-7.50010-3
  48. Kihlstrom RE, Romer D, Williams S. Risk Aversion with Random Initial Wealth. Econometrica. 1981, 49(4): 911. https://doi.org/10.2307/1912510
  49. Montesano A. De Finetti and the Arrow–Pratt measure of risk aversion. Bruno de Finetti Radical Probabilist. College Publications, London. 2009: 115-127.
  50. Thaler RH. The psychology of choice and the assumptions of economics. Quasi rational economics. 1991, 137: 139-155.
  51. Thaler RH, Tversky A, Kahneman D, et al. The Effect of Myopia and Loss Aversion on Risk Taking: An Experimental Test. The Quarterly Journal of Economics. 1997, 112(2): 647-661. https://doi.org/10.1162/003355397555226
  52. Benartzi S, Thaler RH. Risk Aversion or Myopia? Choices in Repeated Gambles and Retirement Investments. Management Science. 1999, 45(3): 364-381. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.45.3.364
  53. Rabin M, Thaler RH. Anomalies: Risk Aversion. Journal of Economic Perspectives. 2001, 15(1): 219-232. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.15.1.219
  54. Thaler RH. Behavioral Economics: Past, Present, and Future. American Economic Review. 2016, 106(7): 1577-1600. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.106.7.1577
  55. Werner J. Risk Aversion. The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics. Published online 2008: 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95121-5_2741-1
  56. Kennickell AB. Multiple imputation in the Survey of Consumer Finances. InProceedings of the Section on Survey Research Methods, 1998.
  57. Kennickell A, Board Of Governors Of The Federal Reserve System. Survey of Consumer Finances, 1989. Survey of Consumer Finances Series. Published online 1993. https://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR09687.V2
  58. Katitas A. (2019). Getting Started with Multiple Imputation in R. In: University of Virginia Library-Statlab Articles, 2019.
  59. Dohmen T, Falk A, Huffman D, et al. Individual risk attitudes: Measurement, determinants, and behavioral consequences. Journal of the european economic association. 2011, 9(3): 522-550. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1542-4774.2011.01015.x
  60. Nam Y, Hanna SD. The effects of risk aversion on life insurance ownership of single-parent households. Applied Economics Letters. 2018, 26(15): 1285-1288. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504851.2018.1546044
  61. Frost J. Multicollinearity in regression analysis: problems, detection, and solutions. Statistics by Jim. 2017, 2: 2.
  62. 5 Dormann CF, Elith J, Bacher S, et al. Collinearity: a review of methods to deal with it and a simulation study evaluating their performance. Ecography. 2012, 36(1): 27-46. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0587.2012.07348.x
  63. Tomaschek F, Hendrix P, Baayen RH. Strategies for addressing collinearity in multivariate linguistic data. Journal of Phonetics. 2018, 71: 249-267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2018.09.004