Open Access Peer-reviewed Research Article

School educational software designed for children with special education needs

Article Sidebar

Importance of special education
Download PDF
Submitted   Jun 28, 2022
Published   Aug 26, 2022
Issue    Vol 2 No 2 (2022)
DOI   10.25082/AMLER.2022.02.014

Views

1422

Downloads

555

Citations

PlumX Metrics

Main Article Content

Meyluz Monica Paico Campos
Facultad de Ciencias e Ingeniería, Universidad de Ciencias y Humanidades, Lima, Peru
Laberiano Andrade–Arenas corresponding author
Facultad de Ciencias e Ingeniería, Universidad de Ciencias y Humanidades, Lima, Peru

Abstract

The research focuses on children with special educational needs, who are unable to access an education either because they do not have a school near their homes or because   they are misinformed by parents that they can access an education regardless of their disability. By not receiving an education, children are deprived of their right to education. Therefore, a prototype of an educational software was designed taking advantage of the technological tools for learning of children with special educational needs. A hybrid methodology and the Balsamiq tool were used, as they were the appropriate ones to develop the project. The result is that children with disabilities can learn by interacting with technology and in the same way their parents can visualize some exercises and crafts that   can be done at home with their children, since it is based on their educational needs.

Keywords
educational software, methodology hybrid, special education

Article Details

How to Cite
Paico Campos, M. M., & Andrade–Arenas, L. (2022). School educational software designed for children with special education needs. Advances in Mobile Learning Educational Research, 2(2), 455-463. https://doi.org/10.25082/AMLER.2022.02.014
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

References

  1. Garzón Artacho, E., Martínez, T.S., Ortega Martín, J. L., Marín Marín, J. A., Gómez García, G. (2020). Teacher Training in Lifelong Learning -- The Importance of Digital Competence in the Encouragement of Teaching Innovation. Sustainability, 12(7), 2852. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12072852
  2. Blau, I., Shamir-Inbal, T. (2016). Digital Competences and Long-Term ICT Integration in School Culture: The Perspective of Elementary School Leaders. Education and Information Technologies, 22(3), 769-87. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-015-9456-7
  3. Brownell, M. T., Adams, A., Sindelar, P., Waldron, N., & Vanhover, S. (2016). Learning from Collaboration: The Role of Teacher Qualities. Exceptional Children, 72(2), 169-185. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440290607200203
  4. Chaiyo, Y., & Nokham, R. (2017). The Effect of Kahoot, Quizizz and Google Forms on the Student's Perception in the Classrooms Response System. 2nd Joint International Conference on Digital Arts, Media and Technology 2017: Digital Economy for Sustainable Growth, ICDAMT, 2017, 178-182. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICDAMT.2017.7904957
  5. Christ, T., Arya, P., & Chiu, M. M. (2017). Video Use in Teacher Education: An International Survey of Practices. Teaching and Teacher Education, 63, 22-35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2016.12.005
  6. Frisancho, S., & Delgado, G. E. (2018). Moral Education as Intercultural Moral Education. Intercultural Education , 29(1), 18-39. https://doi.org/10.1080/14675986.2017.1405214
  7. Hagaman, J. L., & Casey, K. J.. (2017). Teacher Attrition in Special Education: Perspectives From the Field. Teacher Education and Special Education, 41(4), 277-291. https://doi.org/10.1177/0888406417725797
  8. Hazen, D. C. (1978). The Politics of Schooling in the Nonliterate Third World: The Case of Highland Peru. History of Education Quarterly, 18(4), 419-43. https://doi.org/10.2307/367712
  9. Hernandez, R. M. (2017). ERIC - EJ1139346 - Impact of ICT on Education: Challenges and Perspectives. Journal of Educational Psychology - Propositos y Representaciones, 2017. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1139346
  10. Jansen, E. (2018). The Influence of the Teacher-Child Relationship on Internalizing Problems in Special Education. https://theses.ubn.ru.nl/handle/123456789/6675
  11. Kalogiannakis, M., & Papadakis, S. (2017a). An evaluation of Greek educational Android apps for preschoolers. In proceedings of the 12th Conference of the European Science Education Research Association (ESERA), Research, Practice and Collaboration in Science Education, Dublin City University and the University of Limerick, Dublin, Ireland (pp. 21-25).
  12. Kalogiannakis, M., & Papadakis, S. (2017b). Pre-service kindergarten teachers acceptance of "ScratchJr" as a tool for learning and teaching computational thinking and Science education. In Proceedings of the 12th Conference of the European Science Education Research Association (ESERA), Research, practice and collaboration in science education (pp. 21-25). Dublin: Dublin City University and the University of Limerick.
  13. Kalogiannakis, M., & Papadakis, S. (2020). The use of developmentally mobile applications for preparing pre-service teachers to promote STEM activities in preschool classrooms. Mobile Learning Applications in Early Childhood Education, (pp. 82-100). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-1486-3.ch005
  14. Kapaniaris, A. G., & Zampetoglou, G. (2021). Visual Programming for the Creation of Digital Shadow Play Performance Using Mobile Devices in Times of Covid-19. Advances in Mobile Learning Educational Research, 1(2), 162-70. https://doi.org/10.25082/AMLER.2021.02.010
  15. Katsaris, I., & Vidakis, N. (2021). Adaptive e-learning systems through learning styles: A review of the literature. Advances in Mobile Learning Educational Research, 1(2), 124-145. https://doi.org/10.25082/AMLER.2021.02.007
  16. Kauffman, J. M., Hallahan, D. P., Pullen, P. C., & Badar, J. (2018). Special Education: What It Is and Why We Need It. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315211831
  17. Konstantopoulou, G., Dimitra, V., Papakala, I., Styliani, R., Vasiliki, T., Ioakeimidi, M., Niros, A., Boutis, M., & Iliou, T. (2022). The mental resilience of employees in special education during the pandemic Covid-19. Advances in Mobile Learning Educational Research, 2(1), 246-250. https://doi.org/10.25082/AMLER.2022.01.008
  18. Langher, V., Caputo, A., & Ricci, M. E. (2017). The potential role of perceived support for reduction of special education teachers' burnout. International Journal of Educational Psychology, 6(2), 120-147. https://doi.org/10.17583/ijep.2017.2126
  19. Mamolo, L. A. (2022). Students' evaluation and learning experience on the utilization of Digital Interactive Math Comics (DIMaC) mobile app. Advances in Mobile Learning Educational Research, 2(2), 375-388. https://doi.org/10.25082/AMLER.2022.02.006
  20. Mohammadhasani, N., Fardanesh, H., Hatami, J., & Fabio R. A. The pedagogical agent enhances mathematics learning in ADHD students. Education and Information Technologies, 23(6), 2299-2308. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-018-9710-x
  21. Zaitseva, N. A., Makarova, L. M., Larionova, A. A., Filatov, V. V., Okunev, D. V., Polozhentseva, I. V., & Vikhrova, N. O. (2019). Evaluación de La Competitividad de Los Sujetos Del Mercado de Servicios de Telecomunicaciones. Contemporary dilemmas: Education, Politics and Values, 80. https://dilemascontemporaneoseducacionpoliticayvalores.com
  22. O'hanlon, C. (2018). Special Education Integration in Europe. London. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429503887
  23. Papadakis, S. (2020). Tools for evaluating educational apps for young children: a systematic review of the literature. Interactive Technology and Smart Education, 18(1), 18-49. https://doi.org/10.1108/ITSE-08-2020-0127
  24. Papadakis, S. (2022). Apps to promote computational thinking concepts and coding skills in children of preschool and pre-primary school age. In Research Anthology on Computational Thinking, Programming, and Robotics in the Classroom (pp. 610-630). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-6684-2411-7.ch028
  25. Papadakis, S., Trampas, A., Barianos, A., Kalogiannakis, M., & Vidakis, N. (2020). Evaluating the Learning Process: The ``ThimelEdu'' Educational Game Case Study. In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Computer Supported Education - Volume 2: CSEDU, ISBN 978-989-758-417-6, pages 290-298. https://doi.org/10.5220/0009379902900298
  26. Pappas, M. A., & Drigas, A S. (2015). ICT Based Screening Tools and Etiology of Dyscalculia. International Journal of Engineering Pedagogy, 5(3), 61-66. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijep.v5i3.4735
  27. Piedade, J.; Dorotea, N., Pedro, A., & Matos, J. F. (2020). On Teaching Programming Fundamentals and Computational Thinking with Educational Robotics: A Didactic Experience with Pre-Service Teachers. Education Sciences, 10(9), 214. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci10090214
  28. Santamaria, L., & Thousand, J. (2004). Collaboration, Co-Teaching, and Differentiated Instruction: A Process-Oriented Approach to Whole Schooling, International Journal of Whole Schooling. International Journal of Whole Schooling, 1(1), 13-27.
  29. Skaraki, E., & Kolokotronis, F. (2022). Preschool and early primary school age children learning of computational thinking through the use of asynchronous learning environments in the age of Covid-19. Advances in Mobile Learning Educational Research, 2(1), 180-186. https://doi.org/10.25082/AMLER.2022.01.002
  30. Timpane-Padgham, B. L., Beechie, T., & Klinger, T. (2017). A Systematic Review of Ecological Attributes That Confer Resilience to Climate Change in Environmental Restoration. PLOS ONE, 12(3), e0173812. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0173812
  31. Xu, W., & Zammit, K. (2020). Applying Thematic Analysis to Education: A Hybrid Approach to Interpreting Data in Practitioner Research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 19, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406920918810
  32. Zhao, W., & Shute, V. J. (2019). Can Playing a Video Game Foster Computational Thinking Skills? Computers & Education, 141, 103633. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103633
  33. Zirkel, P. A., & Hetrick, A. (2016). Which Procedural Parts of the IEP Process Are the Most Judicially Vulnerable? Exceptional Children, 83(2), 219-235 https://doi.org/10.1177/0014402916651849