Open Access Peer-reviewed Commentary

Civil-Military Participation in Hostility Model: Theorizing attack of security personnel by civilians and vice versa

Main Article Content

Ishmael D. Norman corresponding author

Abstract

Theorizing civilian attacks on military and police officers in Ghana, the author adopted the Direct Participation in Hostilities concept applied in International Humanitarian Law during war time to protect civilians in the “Civil-Military Participation in Hostility Model”. It seeks to theorize the factors coalescing into incidence of hostilities during peace time by civilians against agents of State Security and vice versa. The Direct Participation in Hostilities refers to the cancellation of security protection of civilians during war, when they opt to participate in hostilities caused by the enemy, military or police intervention or operations. That conduct evaporates the expectation of protection from the military or police personnel, which makes the civilians targets in war times. In peace time, when civilians attack security personnel for cause or without cause, the withdrawal of protective performative services by State Security services should be the same as if it is war time situation justified by the concepts of self-defence and State Security. The “Civil-Military Participation in Hostilities Model” is a constructivist and realist approach to the resulting harm either perpetrated by civilians on the security personnel or the security personnel attacks due to civilian infractions or breach of public order. The eruption of hostilities from either angle may be due to the absence of a capable guardian or legal framework; and the absence of culpability, probity and accountability in security services delivery post-facto.

Keywords
civil-military participation in hostilities, civilian attacks on military, military attacks of civilians, police attacks of civilians, civilian attacks on police, escalation of conflict, mitigation of public order encroachment

Article Details

How to Cite
Norman, I. D. (2024). Civil-Military Participation in Hostility Model: Theorizing attack of security personnel by civilians and vice versa. International Journal of Arts and Humanities, 5(1), 234-242. https://doi.org/10.25082/IJAH.2024.01.005

References

  1. Afrobarometer Institutions and Leadership Survey. (2022). CDD, Accra, Ghana.
  2. Amnesty International. (2021). #EndSARS movement: from Twitter to Nigerian Streets-The “Soro Soke” generation won’t give up. https://www.amnesty.org
  3. Aradau, C. (2004). Security and the democratic scene: desecuritization and emancipation. Journal of International Relations and Development, 7(4), 388–413. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jird.1800030
  4. Asante, T. (2019). Military Officer beaten by residents of Amasaman. https://www.myjoyonline.com
  5. Bazerman, M. (2005). Judgment in managerial decision-making. Hoboken, NJ. Wiley and Sons.
  6. BBC. (2023). Ghana military explain why they arrested 184 people from Ashiaman. https://www.bbc.com
  7. Bennetti, J. (2009). Theory’s role in research. Teaching research methods in the social sciences, 1st ed. Publisher, Ashgate.
  8. Brodeur, J. P. (2007). High and Low Policing in Post-9/11 Times. Policing, 1(1), 25–37. https://doi.org/10.1093/police/pam002
  9. Buzan, B., & Hansen, L. (2009). The Evolution of International Security Studies. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511817762
  10. Buzan, B. (1991). People, States and Fear: An Agenda for International Security Studies in the Post-Cold War Era. Essex: Longman.
  11. Carpiano, R. M. (2006). A guide and glossary on postpositivist theory building for population health. Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health, 60(7), 564–570. https://doi.org/10.1136/jech.2004.031534
  12. Chemerinsky, E. (2018). The ‘reasonable’ use of force by police has killed too many people, California can change that. https://www.latimes.com/opinions
  13. Clayton, D. M. (2018). Black Lives Matter and the Civil Rights Movement: A Comparative Analysis of Two Social Movements in the United States. Journal of Black Studies, 49(5), 448–480. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021934718764099
  14. Emile Short Commission of Inquiry: Ayawaso West Wuogon Election Violence, Ghana. (2020). Government Printers, Barnes Avenue, Accra.
  15. Eroukhmanoff, C. (2018). Securitization Theory: An Introduction. E-International Relations Theory, E-IR Foundations Beginner’s Book, Edited by Stephen Mcglinchey, Rosie Walters & Christian Scheinpflug.
  16. Fernandez, M., Perez-Pena, R., & Bromwich, J. E. (2016). Five Dallas Police Officers were Killed as Payback, Police Chief Says. New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com
  17. Ghana’s National Security Strategy (2020). Ministry of National Security, Ministries, Accra, Ghana. Government Printers, Barnes Avenue, Accra, Ghana.
  18. Ghanaweb. (1998). The Tragic death of Two police officers in 1998, Kwaku Ninja and Taller’s story. https://www.ghanaweb.com
  19. Huffman, A. O. (2015). Bibliography: Homegrown Terrorism and Radicalisation. Perspective on Terrorism, 9(6), 119 – 153. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26297466
  20. Huysmans, J. (2004). Minding Exceptions: The Politics of Insecurity and Liberal Democracy. Contemporary Political Theory, 3(3), 321–341. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.cpt.9300137
  21. ICRC. (2024). International Review of the Red Cross, 2008, No. 872 –- Direct Participation in Hostilities. https://www.icrc.org
  22. Norman, I. D., & Kpeglo, E. D. (2023). Assess Self-Efficacy of Individuals for Personal Protection in Ghana. Journal of Emergency Management and Disaster Communications, 04(02), 153–177. https://doi.org/10.1142/s2689980923500100
  23. Norman, I. (2023). Interference in the Adjudication of Cases and the Negative Consequences on Justice. Chapter 9, pp. 135-141, Identity Politics in Sub-Saharan Africa: The effect of Identitarianism, Afroxenophobia and Vigilantism, Cambridge Publishing Limited, UK.
  24. Janušauskienė, D. (2019). The Perception of Security Threats in Lithuania: A Human Security Perspective. Qualitative Sociology Review, 15(2), 186–198. https://doi.org/10.18778/1733-8077.15.2.12
  25. Kan-Dapaah, A. (2022). Interpretation of the Law Must Not Always Be One-Sided. Personal Communications. https://www.ghanaweb.com
  26. Norman, I. (2023). A Model “Critical Decision-Making Model”, Case-Study of Ghana, West Africa. Advances in Applied Sociology, 13(04), 317–332. https://doi.org/10.4236/aasoci.2023.134020
  27. Norman, I. D. (2022). Statism and the Growth of Authoritarianism in Sub-Saharan Africa. European Journal of Law and Political Science, 1(2), 15–27. https://doi.org/10.24018/ejpolitics.2022.1.2.14
  28. Norman, I. D. (2023). Case-Control Study of Heroes and Cowards. Open Journal of Social Sciences, 11(12), 125–153. https://doi.org/10.4236/jss.2023.1112011
  29. Norman, I. (2021). The Police Use of Force Mandate in West Africa. Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal, 8(5), 341–356. https://doi.org/10.14738/assrj.85.9933
  30. Obasogie, O. K., & Newman, Z. (2017). Police Violence, Use of Force Policies, and Public Health. American Journal of Law & Medicine, 43(2–3), 279–295. https://doi.org/10.1177/0098858817723665
  31. Serebour, A. (2021). Attack on CitiTv Journalist. Statement by the Ministry of National Security. Ministry of National Security, Ministries, Accra, Ghana.
  32. Sturmberg, J. P., & Marcum, J. A. (2023). From cause and effect to causes and effects. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 30(2), 296–308. Portico. https://doi.org/10.1111/jep.13814
  33. Sullivan, A. (2016). Obama tells police after killings: ‘We have your backs’. Reuters. https://www.reuters.com
  34. Snyder, J. (2004). One World, Rival Theories. Foreign Policy, 145, 52. https://doi.org/10.2307/4152944
  35. Use of Force, Ghana Police Service, Standard Operating Procedures, GPS # SPO-04-15. https://www.cademandin.it/ghana_police_report_process.pdf
  36. VanderWeele, T. J. (2019). The Interaction Continuum. Epidemiology, 30(5), 648–658. https://doi.org/10.1097/ede.0000000000001054
  37. Vileikienė, E., & Janušauskienė, D. (2016). Subjective Security in a Volatile Geopolitical Situation: Does Lithuanian Society Feel Safe? Journal on Baltic Security, 2(2), 109–143. https://doi.org/10.1515/jobs-2016-0047